Кофе Hausbrandt Decaffeinato, Италия, в зернах, 500 гр, без кофеина

Tony
10.01.2015 17:03:08     Voile0 un poe8me que j aime bien aussi,c est pas pour les sea chanters de la famlile royal en de9sir d e0 venir, le pire.POP de B.O.Sitting in his seat, a seat broad and brokenIn, sprinkled with ashesPop switches channels, takes anotherShot of Seagrams, neat, and asksWhat to do with me, a green young manWho fails to consider theFlim and flam of the world, sinceThings have been easy for me;I stare hard at his face, a stareThat deflects off his brow;I’m sure he’s unaware of hisDark, watery eyes, thatGlance in different directions,And his slow, unwelcome twitches,Fail to pass.I listen, nod,Listen, open, till I cling to his pale,Beige T-shirt, yelling,Yelling in his ears, that hangWith heavy lobes, but he’s still tellingHis joke, so I ask whyHe’s so unhappy, to which he replies But I don’t care anymore, causeHe took too damn long, and fromUnder my seat, I pull out theMirror I’ve been saving; I’m laughing,Laughing loud, the blood rushing from his faceTo mine, as he grows small,A spot in my brain, somethingThat may be squeezed out, like aWatermelon seed betweenTwo fingers.Pop takes another shot, neat,Points out the same amberStain on his shorts that I’ve got on mine, andMakes me smell his smell, comingFrom me; he switches channels, recites an old poemHe wrote before his mother died,Stands, shouts, and asksFor a hug, as I shrink, myArms barely reaching aroundHis thick, oily neck, and his broad back; ’causeI see my face, framed withinPop’s black-framed glassesAnd know he’s laughing too.laugh, babe, laugh.

Antonietta
31.12.2014 15:33:10     I can really see all of these being true.Weirdly we had to do somiehtng similar in class today.However, as someone else said, if the one about Quentin Tarantino is true then you really should watch Pulp Fiction and Inglorious Basterds. Also, True Romance is quite good although QT didn't direct. Other than that his films are pretty poor, but those are genuine masterpieces.

Anggur
30.12.2014 14:41:12     BJohnM, thank you very much for your insightful coenmmts on both this post and my male-female complementarity post a day ago. They encourage me, because they help me see that what I hope to do on this blog may be succeeding a bit: my goal is to take the theological resources I've been given through my education and teaching career, and make them accessible to a wide audience. The churches have hoarded such resources. Church members deserve to have access to them.I like the analogy of Kasper as the Catholic Rove. It fits, sadly. You're right, I fear he's just providing talking points in which he himself can hardly believe wholeheartedly.And I also liked your coenmmts about the next logical step, if marriage is only for procreation: we should require tests demonstrating a couple can conceive, and oaths in which the couple commits itself to conceive. That is, we should do that if we're logical.I've heard that totally la-la land argument you mention, about the possibility of miracles for a male-female couple who can't conceive. People who introduce possible miracles as their best argument for ethical positions are tacitly admitting they just don't have a persuasive argument.